Phil Ivey Vs Casino Average ratng: 3,5/5 5249 reviews

By the looks of things, Phil Ivey and the Borgata Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City are nowhere near done with each other. The edge-sorting real-life court drama is the saga that keeps on giving.

  1. Phil Ivey Vs Casinos
  2. Phil Ivey Vs Casino

In early September, Ivey filed an appeal to prevent Borgata from immediately collecting on its $10 million judgment.

Not to be outdone, Borgata cross-appealed last week, asking the court to review every ruling in the case that went against the Atlantic City casino.

Phil Ivey Beats the Casino so he is Labeled a “CHEATER” May 22, 2013 by progamblerslife 1 Comment It absolutely disgusts me that whenever someone beats the casino they are immediately labeled a “cheater” by the casinos, but what disgusts me even more is how the mainstream media and others jump on board. One of the world's top poker players, Phil Ivey, has lost a Supreme Court bid to reclaim £7.7m of winnings withheld by a London casino for five years. The American was challenging a Court of Appeal. Judge Issues New Ruling In Phil Ivey Edge Sorting Case Versus Borgata Matthew Clark March 28, 2018 The ongoing $9.6 million edge sorting case involving Phil Ivey and the Borgata Casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey has a new wrinkle.

Borgata’s legal team admits the appeals are not likely to change the rulings in effect. A schedule for the appeal hearing is not known. Borgata can continue to attempt to collect the award until a reversal of the decision — if it comes.

  • Phil Ivey Continues To Strike Back At Borgata Casino - January 5, 2020 January 5, 2020 - Andrew Harmon Ivey and his friend Cheung Yin “Kelly” Sun carried out a technique called edge sorting where cards are interpreted as low or high based on imperfections in some of the cards.
  • The long legal battle between poker superstar Phil Ivey and East Coast casino Borgata over nearly $10 million that the former won in baccarat may finally be coming to a close. NJ Online Gambling.

A look back at Borgata vs. Ivey

Borgata filed court documents in 2014 seeking restitution from Ivey alleging he and his partner defrauded the casino.

Borgata went so far as to claim Ivey and his partner, Cheng Yin “Kelly” Sun, participated in a RICO operation at the state and federal level. The casino tried to convince the court the duo purposefully used edge-sorting to take financial advantage of the popular AC destination. Borgata asked for $30 million from the poker pro.

Phil Ivey Vs Casino

US district court judge Noel Hillman found in favor of the casino but not for fraudulent behavior. Instead, Hillman found Ivey violated the Casino Control Act that ensures a fair game for both parties by using employing edge-sorting to his advantage.

“Ivey and Sun, and perhaps others view their actions to be akin to cunning, but not rule-breaking, maneuvers performed in many games. Even though Ivey and Sun’s cunning and skill did not break the rules of baccarat, what sets Ivey and Sun’s actions apart from deceitful maneuvers in other games is that those maneuvers broke the rules of gambling as defined in this state.”

The award of $10.1 million to the Borgata, in essence, returned the assets of each party back to where they were before the baccaratplaying spree.

Initially, the court ruled Borgata could start collecting immediately. Ivey contended it will do “irreparable harm” to his business and filed the appeal to stop collections.

What is edge-sorting (and why it’s wrong)?

Edge-sorting is a skill that allows someone to determine the value of the card while it is face down.

During the manufacturing of the cards, they are cut in such a way that the pattern on the back of the cards is not uniform. For example, one edge might have a larger portion of a shape than another.

Phil Ivey Vs Casino

However, that alone isn’t enough to give a player a huge advantage in baccarat. The player has to manipulate the dealer into sorting the cards to ensure the high-value cards face one way and low-value cards face the other. The sorting of cards allows the player to determine what cards are coming before the card leaves the shoe.

In Ivey and Sun’s case, their requests for a certain brand of cards, asking the dealer to turn the cards a certain way, and keeping the same deck amounts to something similar to card counting in blackjack.

It’s not illegal, but it does not constitute a fair game.

On Sign Up

Phil Ivey Vs Casinos

100% up to $1,500 Deposit Bonus Offer
Casino

Phil Ivey Vs Casino

Ivey returns to tournament poker

Ivey was conspicuously absent from the poker tournament circuit for quite some time. Earlier this year, he made an appearance at Triton Super High Roller Series in Montenegro.

Living up to his reputation as one of the best poker professionals of all time, he wins a short deck title right out of the gate. It’s been two years since he racked up an official tournament cash.

After Montenegro, Ivey turned up in the Nevada desert. He spent the summer playing several events at the World Series of Poker.

So far this year, Ivey has racked up $2.4 million in tournament earnings. Ivey can’t enter a poker tournament without the media reporting on his every move.

The amount he won over just two tournament series is a quarter of what he owes Borgata. He might be hard-pressed to convince a judge that paying back the casino will be a “hardship” to his business.